<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: back here, back now!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/</link>
	<description>notes from the digital underground</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SaraDevil</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/#comment-15001</link>
		<dc:creator>SaraDevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/?p=795#comment-15001</guid>
		<description>Freaking UK. 

On the other hand I found this quirky little group that I have to say has quickly made it into my top rotation. It makes me feel like I have the album the New Pornographers which Challengers had been but wasn't. 

Good Stuff. 

http://www.emusic.com/artist/Los-Campesinos-MP3-Download/11789864.html

What I don't get is why great labels come and then leave. I feel like emusic has more respect for the music but then labels pull out. Either way enjoy the music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freaking UK. </p>
<p>On the other hand I found this quirky little group that I have to say has quickly made it into my top rotation. It makes me feel like I have the album the New Pornographers which Challengers had been but wasn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Good Stuff. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.emusic.com/artist/Los-Campesinos-MP3-Download/11789864.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.emusic.com/artist/Los-Campesinos-MP3-Download/11789864.html</a></p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t get is why great labels come and then leave. I feel like emusic has more respect for the music but then labels pull out. Either way enjoy the music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porieux</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/#comment-14973</link>
		<dc:creator>porieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/?p=795#comment-14973</guid>
		<description>There were so many great dance records in the 90s, that would be a toughy.

I donwloaded 'Bring it On' by Goose, never heard much of them but i dig the Soulwax vibe very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were so many great dance records in the 90s, that would be a toughy.</p>
<p>I donwloaded &#8216;Bring it On&#8217; by Goose, never heard much of them but i dig the Soulwax vibe very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/#comment-14972</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/?p=795#comment-14972</guid>
		<description>For those of you in the UK Fatboy Slim's "Better Living Through Chemistry" is essential listening - shows what Norm could do without flashy colaborations and an over-reliance on other people's records.  Arguably the best Dance music LP of the 90s.  Discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you in the UK Fatboy Slim&#8217;s &#8220;Better Living Through Chemistry&#8221; is essential listening - shows what Norm could do without flashy colaborations and an over-reliance on other people&#8217;s records.  Arguably the best Dance music LP of the 90s.  Discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/#comment-14970</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/?p=795#comment-14970</guid>
		<description>There are some tracks showing to us US subscribers.
Looks like we got Cut La Roc, Goose, Low Fidelity Allstars (though their not their incredible debut), and some Dave Clarke singles.

Downloading now incase they get pulled.  Is it just Fatboy Slim we're not getting?  Was hoping some more Dave Clarke showed up in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some tracks showing to us US subscribers.<br />
Looks like we got Cut La Roc, Goose, Low Fidelity Allstars (though their not their incredible debut), and some Dave Clarke singles.</p>
<p>Downloading now incase they get pulled.  Is it just Fatboy Slim we&#8217;re not getting?  Was hoping some more Dave Clarke showed up in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yancey</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/#comment-14962</link>
		<dc:creator>yancey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/?p=795#comment-14962</guid>
		<description>yeah, this is uk only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, this is uk only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisd</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/#comment-14961</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/?p=795#comment-14961</guid>
		<description>I'm not seeing any Fatboy Slim records from Skint on eMusic right now.  (I'm a U.S. user.)  Are they only available outside the U.S., or is eMu still in the process of adding them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not seeing any Fatboy Slim records from Skint on eMusic right now.  (I&#8217;m a U.S. user.)  Are they only available outside the U.S., or is eMu still in the process of adding them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruadork</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/05/29/back-here-back-now/#comment-14957</link>
		<dc:creator>ruadork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/?p=795#comment-14957</guid>
		<description>By welcoming "fully back onto the site," is this a case of a label which previously pulled out of the site now returning to emu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By welcoming &#8220;fully back onto the site,&#8221; is this a case of a label which previously pulled out of the site now returning to emu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
