na: aphex twin

07Apr08

a65aaa63eb074d17cfde0c8ca6fbdb54.jpg

As you may have noticed, recently eMusic has gotten an incredible catalogue on the site that should remind fans of just how classic a certain artist is. Nope, I’m not talking about the Rolling Stones

Late last week, some of R&S’ recently reissued catalog and, among it, was the Selected Ambient Works 85-92 compilation. It’s a collection of Richard D. James’ earliest compositions and is one of the best primer’s to IDM that I know of. Warm, inviting and altogether life-changing for this correspondent, I can’t recommend it highly enough. Try “Heliosphan” and “Ageispolis” to get started.

From Philip Sherburne’s eMusic review:

Pensive, melancholic, even understated, the album foregoes James’ later interest in shock value in favor of emotive melodies, hypnotic rhythms and spine-tingling electronic timbres….casual electronic-music fans may find this to be the only Aphex Twin record they need. But it’s certainly one that anyone with any interest in the genre owes it to him- or herself to check out. Despite its age, it hasn’t dated one bit.


8 Responses to “na: aphex twin”  

  1. 1 SaraDevil

    And they’re back! Yay!

    While there are lots of nice classics in the cataloge it also looks like some other stuff got pulled out which is a shame. Still, enjoying the Stones though!

  2. 2 qwynwyn

    This is such a great album! I wasn’t too keen on the other available albums from that label. Perhaps you all can change my mind.

  3. 3 jim

    Hey, glad to see the site’s back from it’s 503 vacation.

  4. 4 chris

    yeah absolute genius – and it still sounds good today some 15-20 years later

    ( oh god! is really that long ago? )

  5. 5 WJPurdy

    I listen to it once a month — it’s a particular favorite from (what for me was) an especially rich era for electronic music.

  6. 6 porieux

    The samples make it sound very low fi to me, is that a misrepresentation?

  7. 7 potta

    porieux!

    a lot of the tracks were recorded in 1985 on C60′s in a shed (or similar! i guess that does make it lo-fi or even no-fi.

  8. 8 skerzo

    Yeah, lo-fi is right – seems strange/contradictory to think you can listen to ‘modern’ electronic music and the older, classic stuff can actually begin to have that sepia tone of age about it…. it was once ‘the future’ (TM)

Leave a Reply