<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: na: the rolling stones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/</link>
	<description>notes from the digital underground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soma muscle relaxant.</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-15319</link>
		<dc:creator>Soma muscle relaxant.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-15319</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Soma....&lt;/strong&gt;

Soma to florida....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Soma&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Soma to florida&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiDoJo</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13678</link>
		<dc:creator>MiDoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13678</guid>
		<description>Yeah, FrankHecker (is it hecker or heckler?) wrote a good blog entry on it (see the link under the Comments here)
            &#124;
            &#124;
            &#124;
            &#124;
            V</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, FrankHecker (is it hecker or heckler?) wrote a good blog entry on it (see the link under the Comments here)<br />
            |<br />
            |<br />
            |<br />
            |<br />
            V</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamm</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13673</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13673</guid>
		<description>So I just noticed ABKCO&#039;s disappearance. Sorry to see them go, glad I got some while it was here. I hope you sent them a bill for all the time you put in on the launch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I just noticed ABKCO&#8217;s disappearance. Sorry to see them go, glad I got some while it was here. I hope you sent them a bill for all the time you put in on the launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eMusic bids the Stones goodbye &#171; Swindleeeee!!!!!</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13446</link>
		<dc:creator>eMusic bids the Stones goodbye &#171; Swindleeeee!!!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13446</guid>
		<description>[...] every eMusic subscriber knows, not too long ago eMusic did a deal with ABKCO to sell the early Rolling Stones back catalog under standard eMusic terms (DRM-free MP3s sold at 33 cents per track or even less depending on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] every eMusic subscriber knows, not too long ago eMusic did a deal with ABKCO to sell the early Rolling Stones back catalog under standard eMusic terms (DRM-free MP3s sold at 33 cents per track or even less depending on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midojo</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13173</link>
		<dc:creator>midojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13173</guid>
		<description>@Yancey Thanks for the 15 songs article.  I would have completely glossed over the &quot;Yer Blues&quot; and &quot;A Quick One. . . &quot;  I&#039;m one of the few human mammels that never really liked the Stones.  I mean, sure there are songs on &quot;Through The Past Darkly (Big Hits Vol.2)&quot; that as a kid I used to play off of my father&#039;s LP (one of the best Vinyl cases ever: hexagon) but for the most part I was never into them (read this as I think they are a greatly talented band but their music hasn&#039;t touched me much so I pretty much ignored the biggest band ever to come to eMusic when they were put on the na list).

Maybe I&#039;ll even download &quot;Mother&#039;s Little Helper&quot; off of  Darkly, &#039;cause I keep getting it stuck in my skull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yancey Thanks for the 15 songs article.  I would have completely glossed over the &#8220;Yer Blues&#8221; and &#8220;A Quick One. . . &#8221;  I&#8217;m one of the few human mammels that never really liked the Stones.  I mean, sure there are songs on &#8220;Through The Past Darkly (Big Hits Vol.2)&#8221; that as a kid I used to play off of my father&#8217;s LP (one of the best Vinyl cases ever: hexagon) but for the most part I was never into them (read this as I think they are a greatly talented band but their music hasn&#8217;t touched me much so I pretty much ignored the biggest band ever to come to eMusic when they were put on the na list).</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll even download &#8220;Mother&#8217;s Little Helper&#8221; off of  Darkly, &#8217;cause I keep getting it stuck in my skull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Love</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13172</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13172</guid>
		<description>a few of my unsung favorites: &quot;I&#039;m a King Bee,&quot; &quot;Fingerprint File,&quot; &quot;Hand of Fate,&quot; &quot;Indian Girl,&quot; &quot;No Use in Crying.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a few of my unsung favorites: &#8220;I&#8217;m a King Bee,&#8221; &#8220;Fingerprint File,&#8221; &#8220;Hand of Fate,&#8221; &#8220;Indian Girl,&#8221; &#8220;No Use in Crying.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Json</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13171</link>
		<dc:creator>Json</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13171</guid>
		<description>Will this be US-only forever?

Canada needs the love!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this be US-only forever?</p>
<p>Canada needs the love!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porieux</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13170</link>
		<dc:creator>porieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13170</guid>
		<description>I think the more music eMusic gets the better. Mainstream, underground, whatever. It all belongs there, and will only improve the service. There is no way adding more music could ever be a bad thing (though the mechanisms for finding, sorting etc that music can always be improved).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the more music eMusic gets the better. Mainstream, underground, whatever. It all belongs there, and will only improve the service. There is no way adding more music could ever be a bad thing (though the mechanisms for finding, sorting etc that music can always be improved).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13169</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13169</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not looking for mainstream artists to flood into eMusic, either.  A little of that goes a long way, and too much of it could do real harm to eMusic&#039;s niche in the market (and put it in a grey area where it&#039;s more squarely competing for iTunes, which would be an uphill battle).  So I&#039;ll shed no tears if we never see Asia or Boston or Beyonce or the Backstreet Boys on eMusic.

But having said that, select items from a major label&#039;s back catalogue fit nicely within eMusic&#039;s concept.  And today&#039;s additions from The Rolling Stones do, as well.  These songs are gritty and savage and bluesy; they aren&#039;t sleek or polished or glossy.  They fit here, I think, and Yancey&#039;s feature today -- highlighting overlooked Stones gems -- makes a powerful case for why they belong here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not looking for mainstream artists to flood into eMusic, either.  A little of that goes a long way, and too much of it could do real harm to eMusic&#8217;s niche in the market (and put it in a grey area where it&#8217;s more squarely competing for iTunes, which would be an uphill battle).  So I&#8217;ll shed no tears if we never see Asia or Boston or Beyonce or the Backstreet Boys on eMusic.</p>
<p>But having said that, select items from a major label&#8217;s back catalogue fit nicely within eMusic&#8217;s concept.  And today&#8217;s additions from The Rolling Stones do, as well.  These songs are gritty and savage and bluesy; they aren&#8217;t sleek or polished or glossy.  They fit here, I think, and Yancey&#8217;s feature today &#8212; highlighting overlooked Stones gems &#8212; makes a powerful case for why they belong here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hilton</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/comment-page-1/#comment-13168</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2008/04/03/na-the-rolling-stones/#comment-13168</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I&#039;m not one of those folks who miss the big-name acts (you can always get them elsewhere), but still--this is a huge addition.  Well done.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Between this and Jay-Z earlier in the month, we might be headed for a troll-free 2009.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
People who are inclined to troll will &lt;i&gt;always&lt;/i&gt; find something to troll about.  Alas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I&#8217;m not one of those folks who miss the big-name acts (you can always get them elsewhere), but still&#8211;this is a huge addition.  Well done.</p>
<blockquote><p>Between this and Jay-Z earlier in the month, we might be headed for a troll-free 2009.</p></blockquote>
<p>People who are inclined to troll will <i>always</i> find something to troll about.  Alas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.035 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 341/345 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: 17dots.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: 17dots.com @ 2012-02-11 12:21:01 -->
