<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: an epitaph for epitaph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/</link>
	<description>notes from the digital underground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: [WaTunes] &#8211; Will More Indie Labels Return To eMusic? &#171; WaTunes &#8211; WordPress</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-130603</link>
		<dc:creator>[WaTunes] &#8211; Will More Indie Labels Return To eMusic? &#171; WaTunes &#8211; WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-130603</guid>
		<description>[...] Epitaph and sister label Anti left, then eMusic CEO David Pakman felt compelled to rebut the departure on the official blog: &quot;Epitaph has been a notable supporter of eMusic for many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Epitaph and sister label Anti left, then eMusic CEO David Pakman felt compelled to rebut the departure on the official blog: &quot;Epitaph has been a notable supporter of eMusic for many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-23192</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-23192</guid>
		<description>Go to google and search Bad Religion discography torrent.  Enjoy.  Shoulda stayed on Emusic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to google and search Bad Religion discography torrent.  Enjoy.  Shoulda stayed on Emusic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiDoJo</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-14160</link>
		<dc:creator>MiDoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-14160</guid>
		<description>STOPPPPPPPPP!!!! The Last Link at the Bottom of this Thread (oi oi oi dropkick murphys) open&#039;s a webpage that opens multiple pop-up fake AntiVirus warning messages and scans.  I deem this link unsafe for all 17Dots users.  If you disagree (and remember I am a security zealot so I know that nothing else caused these to occur) than pm me in emuser (if you are a real emusic/17dots fan)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOPPPPPPPPP!!!! The Last Link at the Bottom of this Thread (oi oi oi dropkick murphys) open&#8217;s a webpage that opens multiple pop-up fake AntiVirus warning messages and scans.  I deem this link unsafe for all 17Dots users.  If you disagree (and remember I am a security zealot so I know that nothing else caused these to occur) than pm me in emuser (if you are a real emusic/17dots fan)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FriendlyFascism</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-8864</link>
		<dc:creator>FriendlyFascism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-8864</guid>
		<description>I was (am?) disappointed to see the Epitaph/Anti- titles go from eMusic.  From the price point discussion, it seems that Mr. Gurewitz is becoming just as uncompromising as the major labels, and as foolish as Greg Ginn&#039;s SST Records attitude toward Negativland.  My backup has always been used CDs and I see no reason to stop that now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was (am?) disappointed to see the Epitaph/Anti- titles go from eMusic.  From the price point discussion, it seems that Mr. Gurewitz is becoming just as uncompromising as the major labels, and as foolish as Greg Ginn&#8217;s SST Records attitude toward Negativland.  My backup has always been used CDs and I see no reason to stop that now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobO</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-8863</link>
		<dc:creator>BobO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-8863</guid>
		<description>Hopefully everyone who has an eMusic account and has ever downloaded a song from Epitaph label and it&#039;s affiliates will write Epitaph (retail@epitaph.com)  Maybe with a big enough response they will reconsider their decision.

My letter to Epitaph:

Having been a long time fan of Epitaph records and their many great artists, I am writing to express my disappointment with your decision to no longer sell your catalogue on eMusic in the U.S.   I have always considered Epitaph to be an independent label that would never conform to the ideology of the crappy corporate major labels.  Unfortunately, I am now forced to wonder if Epitaph is trying to become just like those major labels where the bottom line means more than fans or the artists. I hope that in the future Epitaph Records and it&#039;s affiliates will return to eMusic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully everyone who has an eMusic account and has ever downloaded a song from Epitaph label and it&#8217;s affiliates will write Epitaph (retail@epitaph.com)  Maybe with a big enough response they will reconsider their decision.</p>
<p>My letter to Epitaph:</p>
<p>Having been a long time fan of Epitaph records and their many great artists, I am writing to express my disappointment with your decision to no longer sell your catalogue on eMusic in the U.S.   I have always considered Epitaph to be an independent label that would never conform to the ideology of the crappy corporate major labels.  Unfortunately, I am now forced to wonder if Epitaph is trying to become just like those major labels where the bottom line means more than fans or the artists. I hope that in the future Epitaph Records and it&#8217;s affiliates will return to eMusic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefe de Zorros</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-8862</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefe de Zorros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-8862</guid>
		<description>Well like others, I&#039;m extremely disappointed with this move by Epitaph.  I&#039;m sure they feel they have a viable business reason for doing this, but I hope it turns out to flop.  What awful timing, as a new Weakerthans album just came out last Tuesday, and that only happens every 3 years or so.

I took the libery of writing the Weakerthans to ask them how they would prefer I acquired their new album.  I explained the situation and how I would not buy it off of iTunes as I didn&#039;t want to reinforce Epitaph&#039;s decision.  They responded &quot;Our record is in stores.. support your local indie record shop.&quot;

I was a bit disappointed in this response from a band who is so rooted in anti-capitalism.  I responded that I&#039;d prefer to stick to digital downloads as they don&#039;t rely on foreign oil to get into my hands.

It makes me sick because I really want this album.  I pull it up on iTunes occasionally to listen to the samples, but I refuse to purchase it.  Same goes for Motion City Soundtrack.

Does anyone know what&#039;s going on with New West?  I noticed they aren&#039;t adding their newest stuff either, but they haven&#039;t pulled their old stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well like others, I&#8217;m extremely disappointed with this move by Epitaph.  I&#8217;m sure they feel they have a viable business reason for doing this, but I hope it turns out to flop.  What awful timing, as a new Weakerthans album just came out last Tuesday, and that only happens every 3 years or so.</p>
<p>I took the libery of writing the Weakerthans to ask them how they would prefer I acquired their new album.  I explained the situation and how I would not buy it off of iTunes as I didn&#8217;t want to reinforce Epitaph&#8217;s decision.  They responded &#8220;Our record is in stores.. support your local indie record shop.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was a bit disappointed in this response from a band who is so rooted in anti-capitalism.  I responded that I&#8217;d prefer to stick to digital downloads as they don&#8217;t rely on foreign oil to get into my hands.</p>
<p>It makes me sick because I really want this album.  I pull it up on iTunes occasionally to listen to the samples, but I refuse to purchase it.  Same goes for Motion City Soundtrack.</p>
<p>Does anyone know what&#8217;s going on with New West?  I noticed they aren&#8217;t adding their newest stuff either, but they haven&#8217;t pulled their old stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Jo Jo</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-8861</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Jo Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-8861</guid>
		<description>To Elijah M, on half.com, the lowest price (without shipping) as of this post for the albums you mentioned:  Grinderman $4.95, Neko Case $8.00, and Joe Henry $10.50.  Even at the total prices you quoted, I would probably buy those before using iTunes (well not the Joe Henry, I&#039;d wait a few weeks).  I see your point, and it does seem that Pakman searched for a highly discounted example.  But most of the albums I bought from Epitaph on eMusic were not new releases, and I could have likely gotten the used cd&#039;s for $3-$5 (ok $6-$8 with shipping).  I think the more important point is that eMusic subscribers probably won&#039;t buy from iTunes.  They&#039;ll look in the used market first.  And even though Grinderman and Neko Case is $9.99 on iTunes, I would still probably buy the $11.97 and $12.19 used cd&#039;s you quoted since I&#039;m only $2 away from physical backup, whatever ripping quality I want, and artwork.  No DRM either.  Of course I don&#039;t like to do that very often (pay more than for digital), but I usually don&#039;t have to.  I&#039;ve never bought a song from iTunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Elijah M, on half.com, the lowest price (without shipping) as of this post for the albums you mentioned:  Grinderman $4.95, Neko Case $8.00, and Joe Henry $10.50.  Even at the total prices you quoted, I would probably buy those before using iTunes (well not the Joe Henry, I&#8217;d wait a few weeks).  I see your point, and it does seem that Pakman searched for a highly discounted example.  But most of the albums I bought from Epitaph on eMusic were not new releases, and I could have likely gotten the used cd&#8217;s for $3-$5 (ok $6-$8 with shipping).  I think the more important point is that eMusic subscribers probably won&#8217;t buy from iTunes.  They&#8217;ll look in the used market first.  And even though Grinderman and Neko Case is $9.99 on iTunes, I would still probably buy the $11.97 and $12.19 used cd&#8217;s you quoted since I&#8217;m only $2 away from physical backup, whatever ripping quality I want, and artwork.  No DRM either.  Of course I don&#8217;t like to do that very often (pay more than for digital), but I usually don&#8217;t have to.  I&#8217;ve never bought a song from iTunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elijah M</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-8860</link>
		<dc:creator>Elijah M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-8860</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s disingenuous to imply that you can get a used CD of a recent release for $3, especially now, since fewer and fewer people are actually buying CDs in the first place. When you factor in shipping (which averages around--ahem--$3), they tend to cost the same, if not more, than buying the album on iTunes.

A few examples...

Grinderman:
Lowest used price: 8.99   2.98 shipping = $11.97 total

Neko Case - Fox Confessor Brings the Flood:
Lowest used price: 9.21   2.98 shipping = $12.19 total

Joe Henry - Civilians:
Lowest used price: 12.99   2.98 shipping = $15.97 total

These are all based on Amazon used prices at the time I posted this comment. With some exceptions, older catalog releases tend to be cheaper, but not by much. This article contains some salient points, but they&#039;re obscured by this flagrant exaggeration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s disingenuous to imply that you can get a used CD of a recent release for $3, especially now, since fewer and fewer people are actually buying CDs in the first place. When you factor in shipping (which averages around&#8211;ahem&#8211;$3), they tend to cost the same, if not more, than buying the album on iTunes.</p>
<p>A few examples&#8230;</p>
<p>Grinderman:<br />
Lowest used price: 8.99   2.98 shipping = $11.97 total</p>
<p>Neko Case &#8211; Fox Confessor Brings the Flood:<br />
Lowest used price: 9.21   2.98 shipping = $12.19 total</p>
<p>Joe Henry &#8211; Civilians:<br />
Lowest used price: 12.99   2.98 shipping = $15.97 total</p>
<p>These are all based on Amazon used prices at the time I posted this comment. With some exceptions, older catalog releases tend to be cheaper, but not by much. This article contains some salient points, but they&#8217;re obscured by this flagrant exaggeration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whataslacker</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-8859</link>
		<dc:creator>whataslacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-8859</guid>
		<description>I had a lot of songs/albums I was going to buy. Now gone from my saved for later list. Shame, as I refuse to buy an iPod or download from iTunes. emusic.com was my answer for corporate crap [isn&#039;t that what bands on epitaph rage against?] Sorry to see them go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a lot of songs/albums I was going to buy. Now gone from my saved for later list. Shame, as I refuse to buy an iPod or download from iTunes. emusic.com was my answer for corporate crap [isn't that what bands on epitaph rage against?] Sorry to see them go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyson</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/comment-page-1/#comment-8857</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/09/13/an-epitaph-for-epitaph/#comment-8857</guid>
		<description>Here’s my letter to epitaph:

&quot;I was very sad to hear today that you have removed your entire catalog
of great albums from eMusic. I have been a strong supporter of many of
the artists on your roster for more than 15 years and this leaves a
very sour taste in my mouth.

Due in large part to eMusic I have NOT ONCE illegally downloaded any
epitaph release...in fact I&#039;ve actually re-purchased several Epitaph
releases thru eMusic that I had lost over the years; but I&#039;ll be
damned if this short sighted move on your part doesn&#039;t make me want to
go download the new Weakerthans album off P2P instead of paying for it
as I originally planned.

Do you really think that 99 cents per track with bullshit DRM is a
fair price for your customers??

I have/will never download a track from the iTunes Music Store until
they give their heads a shake and realize:

(1) their prices are too high and
(2) that selling me a track with DRM is unacceptable.

Last time I checked you still sell CDs don&#039;t you??

Well let&#039;s examine what a CD gets me.....

For about 99 cents per track (or less) I get:

&gt; fancy printed artwork that costs you a fortune to manufacture

&gt; a jewel case/shrinkwarp

&gt; and oh ya.....DRM FREE MUSIC!! on a shiny disk that I can keep on my shelf as a backup until the day I die and rip onto my computer as many times as I feel like it!!

....and I&#039;m not even counting the distribution/shelving/etc costs that
I&#039;m saving you by purchasing the album online.

When production/distribution costs go down don&#039;t you usually pass at
least some part of that savings onto the customer??

At any rate, all I&#039;m trying to say is that I feel the price per song
on eMusic is fair for the consumer and last time I checked WE make the
rules by voting with our pocketbooks. I can only hope other eMusic
subscribers will feel as strongly as I do and convince you to come
back.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s my letter to epitaph:</p>
<p>&#8220;I was very sad to hear today that you have removed your entire catalog<br />
of great albums from eMusic. I have been a strong supporter of many of<br />
the artists on your roster for more than 15 years and this leaves a<br />
very sour taste in my mouth.</p>
<p>Due in large part to eMusic I have NOT ONCE illegally downloaded any<br />
epitaph release&#8230;in fact I&#8217;ve actually re-purchased several Epitaph<br />
releases thru eMusic that I had lost over the years; but I&#8217;ll be<br />
damned if this short sighted move on your part doesn&#8217;t make me want to<br />
go download the new Weakerthans album off P2P instead of paying for it<br />
as I originally planned.</p>
<p>Do you really think that 99 cents per track with bullshit DRM is a<br />
fair price for your customers??</p>
<p>I have/will never download a track from the iTunes Music Store until<br />
they give their heads a shake and realize:</p>
<p>(1) their prices are too high and<br />
(2) that selling me a track with DRM is unacceptable.</p>
<p>Last time I checked you still sell CDs don&#8217;t you??</p>
<p>Well let&#8217;s examine what a CD gets me&#8230;..</p>
<p>For about 99 cents per track (or less) I get:</p>
<p>&gt; fancy printed artwork that costs you a fortune to manufacture</p>
<p>&gt; a jewel case/shrinkwarp</p>
<p>&gt; and oh ya&#8230;..DRM FREE MUSIC!! on a shiny disk that I can keep on my shelf as a backup until the day I die and rip onto my computer as many times as I feel like it!!</p>
<p>&#8230;.and I&#8217;m not even counting the distribution/shelving/etc costs that<br />
I&#8217;m saving you by purchasing the album online.</p>
<p>When production/distribution costs go down don&#8217;t you usually pass at<br />
least some part of that savings onto the customer??</p>
<p>At any rate, all I&#8217;m trying to say is that I feel the price per song<br />
on eMusic is fair for the consumer and last time I checked WE make the<br />
rules by voting with our pocketbooks. I can only hope other eMusic<br />
subscribers will feel as strongly as I do and convince you to come<br />
back.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 341/345 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: 17dots.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: 17dots.com @ 2012-02-11 12:33:41 -->
