<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: na: macca, dear &amp; monterey pop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/</link>
	<description>notes from the digital underground</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-5938</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/#comment-5938</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the Archers of Loaf pointer! I&#039;d heard of them, but never listened. Great, great pick.

I agree that small, quiet Paul is the best. My favorite of his Beatles tracks by far are Blackbird and Mother Nature&#039;s Son. Those first two solo records are his best imo too.

I still think his arrival here is generally a very sad thing. Same for the EMI catalog if it ever shows up here as the DRM-free age dawns for the majors. I like Pink Floyd, Kate Bush, Kraftwerk...and everyone on the DFA imprints is among my favorite major-label bands. Several of those definitely count as indie by any definition besides their distributor. Emusic will be a big help to people like The Juan McLean, for example.

But I fear for the sub-The National, Pixies and Sufjan artists -- they&#039;ll always get attention. But just from my recent downloads, 13&amp;God, Boy in Static, pelpp and a.vanvranken, Bark: Psychosis, Over the Atlantic, Slowdive&#039;s Pygmailion, Songs of Green Pheasant...you get the idea. How are they going to stay as visible as they are? Today&#039;s Top Albums is a great tool for me. How&#039;s that going to work with David Gilmour and the Sex Pistols clogging it up? (Again, I like every EMI artist I&#039;m mentioning.)

I promise that it&#039;s not that I want emusic to stay under the radar. I want it to rule the universe with an iron fist, raining down lightning bolts and empty spaghettios cans on iTunes. I want people like you and Michael A to be richer than Zsa Zsa, and able to slap as many cops and get away with it as she did. I sincerely hope that adding DRM-free major artists will help all of you achieve those goals.

But I want the same things for Ben Massarella and Tim Rutili. Okay, and anybody else in Califone besides them. And Felt and Couch and Head Like a Kite and Dirty on Purpose.

I know that indie artists will never vanish at emusic. You&#039;ll all try to help as much as you always have. I like that the McCartney page has all those indie artists too. A very cool way to spread the love.

But every banner for McCartney, Faith Evans or Iron Maiden will mean fewer for Michael Nyman and Ellen Alien. How can it not?

I have faith in emusic, but Yancey, I&#039;m worried about Evil Beaver.

Thanks again for Archers.

Yr pal,
Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the Archers of Loaf pointer! I&#8217;d heard of them, but never listened. Great, great pick.</p>
<p>I agree that small, quiet Paul is the best. My favorite of his Beatles tracks by far are Blackbird and Mother Nature&#8217;s Son. Those first two solo records are his best imo too.</p>
<p>I still think his arrival here is generally a very sad thing. Same for the EMI catalog if it ever shows up here as the DRM-free age dawns for the majors. I like Pink Floyd, Kate Bush, Kraftwerk&#8230;and everyone on the DFA imprints is among my favorite major-label bands. Several of those definitely count as indie by any definition besides their distributor. Emusic will be a big help to people like The Juan McLean, for example.</p>
<p>But I fear for the sub-The National, Pixies and Sufjan artists &#8212; they&#8217;ll always get attention. But just from my recent downloads, 13&amp;God, Boy in Static, pelpp and a.vanvranken, Bark: Psychosis, Over the Atlantic, Slowdive&#8217;s Pygmailion, Songs of Green Pheasant&#8230;you get the idea. How are they going to stay as visible as they are? Today&#8217;s Top Albums is a great tool for me. How&#8217;s that going to work with David Gilmour and the Sex Pistols clogging it up? (Again, I like every EMI artist I&#8217;m mentioning.)</p>
<p>I promise that it&#8217;s not that I want emusic to stay under the radar. I want it to rule the universe with an iron fist, raining down lightning bolts and empty spaghettios cans on iTunes. I want people like you and Michael A to be richer than Zsa Zsa, and able to slap as many cops and get away with it as she did. I sincerely hope that adding DRM-free major artists will help all of you achieve those goals.</p>
<p>But I want the same things for Ben Massarella and Tim Rutili. Okay, and anybody else in Califone besides them. And Felt and Couch and Head Like a Kite and Dirty on Purpose.</p>
<p>I know that indie artists will never vanish at emusic. You&#8217;ll all try to help as much as you always have. I like that the McCartney page has all those indie artists too. A very cool way to spread the love.</p>
<p>But every banner for McCartney, Faith Evans or Iron Maiden will mean fewer for Michael Nyman and Ellen Alien. How can it not?</p>
<p>I have faith in emusic, but Yancey, I&#8217;m worried about Evil Beaver.</p>
<p>Thanks again for Archers.</p>
<p>Yr pal,<br />
Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yancey</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-5934</link>
		<dc:creator>yancey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/#comment-5934</guid>
		<description>five bonus points to mr. b for the &quot;ist&quot; construction. well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>five bonus points to mr. b for the &#8220;ist&#8221; construction. well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr B</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-5935</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/#comment-5935</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t agree with you more about the Archers and Pavement EP&#039;s... Watery Domestic has always been a favourite I can wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone. Short and consise ist the key!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t agree with you more about the Archers and Pavement EP&#8217;s&#8230; Watery Domestic has always been a favourite I can wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone. Short and consise ist the key!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-5937</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/#comment-5937</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t ever apologuze for being long-winded. God knows I couldn&#039;t possibly listen through — much less make sense of — all 40 pages of new stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t ever apologuze for being long-winded. God knows I couldn&#8217;t possibly listen through — much less make sense of — all 40 pages of new stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Minuk</title>
		<link>http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-5936</link>
		<dc:creator>David Minuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://17dots.com/2007/06/05/na-macca-dear-monterey-pop/#comment-5936</guid>
		<description>The Shoutoutlouds link takes you to McCartney&#039;s album....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shoutoutlouds link takes you to McCartney&#8217;s album&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 255/259 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: 17dots.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: 17dots.com @ 2012-02-11 16:30:13 -->
